Return to Home Page Tables and Charts Glossary of Terms Resources
 
Sponsored by Takeda
Executive Summary Methodology Profile of Respondents Plan Design Features Cost Sharing Highlights Pharmacy Reimbursement Highlights Drug Cost Highlights Utilization Management Highlights


 
What the Survey Reports
The 2007 survey captured the copayment and coinsurance amounts for seven drug categories (Generics, Preferred Brands, Nonpreferred Brands, Brands, Lifestyle, Nonformulary, and Specialty Drugs) for both retail and mail prescriptions.

Because few employers provide a benefit for nonformulary drugs — extending an employer’s negotiated pricing to members for noncovered drugs — this report does not report such data.

However, in addition to providing the average amounts of copayments and coinsurance, this survey does report the range, with low, median, and high points. This should provide drug-benefit decision makers with information they can use to set cost sharing amounts.

Overall Cost Sharing Trends

Employers establish drug plan designs to share some portion of drug costs with the plan’s members. The cost shared is usually based on an amount for each tier or drug category. In 2007, members paid a greater percentage of retail costs than mail-service costs. On average, members paid 25.2 percent of a retail prescription but only 19.4 percent of a mail prescription. Table 9 illustrates the range of claim costs paid by members.

The Effects of Incentives
Historically, employers have created incentives for members to use mail service by keeping mail-service cost sharing low relative to retail cost sharing. Although mail-service drug costs are lower, those incentives employers created to increase utilization resulted in mail-service prescriptions costing employers more than retail prescriptions. Employers learned that mail service will not produce savings for them unless cost sharing is structured appropriately.

Now, average mail copayments are more than twice the amount of average retail copayments … for generics, preferred brands and nonpreferred brands. This illustrates that employers have effectively changed their plan designs to realize savings from mail service.

In general, the survey data show employers are motivating members to use generic drugs more frequently by increasing their copayments for preferred brands and decreasing their copayments for generic drugs.

The average 2007 generic copayments have decreased 5.6 percent at retail and 2.0 percent at mail. Meanwhile, since 2005, preferred-drug copayments have shown an increase of 6.8 percent at retail and 14.9 percent at mail. Nonpreferred brand copayments have increased 1.4 percent at retail and 4.8 percent at mail.

Note: This report’s Drug Cost Highlights Section discusses increases in the dispensing of generic drugs.


Table 9: Range of Percentage of Claim Cost Paid by Beneficiaries in Retail and Mail-Service


Lowering Copays to Increase Treatment Adherence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2007 Pharmacy Benefit Management Institute | 8679 E. San Alberto Dr., Ste. 101 | Scottsdale, AZ 85258-4368 | 480.730.0814