Return to Home Page Tables and Charts Glossary of Terms Resources
Executive Summary Methodology Profile of Respondents Plan Design Features Cost Sharing Highlights Pharmacy Reimbursement Highlights Drug Cost Highlights Utilization Management Highlights
 
Changing the Drug Reimbursement Landscape
 
Conversation continues as to which drug price benchmark should replace average wholesale price (AWP). As this occurs, the need for systemic changes to drug pricing and reimbursement should be addressed. With the lawsuits against drug database publishers resolved, the demise of AWP is likely and a different benchmark will be needed.

Simply changing the drug price benchmark does not create a more accurate and valid system of pricing drugs. Figure 6 shows the complex, three layers of drug pricing.

Pharmacy reimbursement and third-party drug claim pricing are complex issues. Payers want to understand more about how drug pricing, reimbursement, and PBM revenue streams are calculated. In keeping with a greater emphasis on transparency in the market, drug benefit plan sponsors want transparency in drug pricing methodologies as well.

It is important for plan sponsors to advocate for a system that is transparent, rational, and intelligible. Product reimbursement should approximate average acquisition costs. Pharmacy dispensing fees should provide fair compensation for services provided to patients.

The system should include incentives for providers and pharmacies to manage drug therapies in a cost-effective manner. The ideal price benchmark should be:

  • Accurate and reliable
  • Clearly defined operationally
  • The simplest methodology possible to yield meaningful values
  • A reasonable estimation of average acquisition cost
  • Sensitive to class of trade issues
  • Updated and reported on a timely basis
  • Verifiable and auditable

Systemic change will take time and implementation will be challenging. Changes to retail pharmacy systems and claims adjudication systems will be necessary. All third-party contracts – payer-PBM, PBM-pharmacy, manufacturer rebate agreements – will need to be renegotiated. The payoff will be an alignment of goals for providers and payers.

In the Short Term...
There are two steps that plan sponsors can take right now.

The first is to evaluate current pharmacy management contract(s) for the ability to renegotiate or adjust terms based on industry changes.

The second step is to monitor industry dialogue about pharmacy reimbursement.

 


Figure 6
: Three Layers of Drug Pricing From Manufacturer to Retail Pharmacy



Proactive Management for Specialty Pharmacy

Medicare Part D Strategies to Change Over Time

Lowering Copays to Increase Treatment Adherence

Decreased Copays Encourage Voluntary Pill Splitting

Strengthening Prescription Drug Safety

FDA Uses Many Tools to Monitor Drugs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2007 Pharmacy Benefit Management Institute | 8679 E. San Alberto Dr., Ste. 101 | Scottsdale, AZ 85258-4368 | 480.730.0814